Donnerstag, 19. Mai 2016

PetitionGoogleNoCensorshipENletter_201605

     


#NoOpinionSuppression #NoCernsoreship #NoRightsViolation #NoLawBending #HumanRights #FreeSpeech #FreeThought
#FreeOpinion #FreeExpression
@Google
Please consider your slogan
"Don't be evil"
as a real promise!

But not only
as pretended ethical value in order to deceive the world public opinion!

@FlorianHensel @GermanJudiciary
Please renounce on mechanisms
which might be habits within injustice systems
but are not compatible to principles of rule of law.

          


Petition letter
Petition letter to:
Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman Google Inc.
Larry Page, CEO Alphabet Inc.
Sunday Pichai, CEO Google Inc
Florian Hensel, Attorney in Munich
Judicial authorities of Germany

#NoOpinionSuppression #NoCernsoreship #NoRightsViolation #NoLawBending #HumanRights #FreeSpeech #FreeThought
#FreeOpinion #FreeExpression

We, the undersigned requests for the full compliance of human rights in the view of Article 19 UDHR, Article 10 of the ECHR and Article 5 of the German Basic Law.
The undersigned requesting also for the omission of any measures, such as deletion, blocking or other measures to prevent access to published posts, which may not be reconciled to the compatibility with the human right of freedom of expression.
Such measures contradict to the democratic self-conception and the principles of rule of law and leaves an impression of ignoring historical lessons or to endeavor to disable the liberal order.
Further requesting the undersigned the omission of any opportunistic reasoning, such as the alleged protection of personal rights, for enabling the unlawful restriction of the fundamental right of freedom of expression.
A limitation regarding to the personal honor is articulated only in the German Basic Law. This restriction stating clearly that this restriction only for personal defamation should be applied and therefore with no circumstances for functionaries within enterprises, institutions, organizations, associations, clubs, offices, authorities, parties or other groupings which are inherently exposed to an increased public perception interest.
Such kind of allegedly limitations lacking any basis until right then, if underlying grievances will be addressed through opinion.
Even more the undersigned requesting that different views regarding an applicability of limitations of basic human rights has to be accepted by decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and not by measures of self-administered justice, as it will undoubtedly embody by deletion, blocking or other access elimination.
With kind regards
The signers



Further links