PetitionBoycottPayPalENletter_201606

	#NoOpinionSuppression #NoCensorship #NoConfidenceAbuse #NoRightsViolation #NoAntiSemitism #HumanRights #HumanDignity #ResponsibilityPerception #FreeSpeech #FreeThought #FreeOpinion #FreeExpression @PayPal @AirbusDS @Signalis Worldwide call to boycott of the above companies due to anti-Semitic attitudes, as well as disregarding human rights and fundamental ethical maxims. Other addressees of the petition: @FlorianHensel @BernhardGerwert @ThomasEnders @LarsImmisch @AndreaPrinz @KaiSchmidt @WolframSchorr @MarcusKrol @SéverineRitter @TanjaHaller
	Petition letter Petition letter to: David Engel, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. David Ferri, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Rupert Keeley, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Victoria Reanney, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Richard Swales, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Séverine Ritter, Brand Risk Management of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Tanja Haller, Brand Risk Management of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Bernhard Gerwert, CEO of Airbus Defence and Space Thomas Enders, CEO of Airbus Group Lars Immisch, Head of HR of Airbus Defence and Space Andrea Prinz, Airbus Defence and Space Kai Schmidt, Airbus Defence and Space Wolfram Schorr, Signalis GmbH Marcus Krol, IN innovative-navigation GmbH Florian Hensel, Attorney of Law in Munich, Germany #NoOpinionSuppression #NoCensorship #NoConfidenceAbuse #NoRightsViolation #NoAntiSemitism #HumanRights #HumanDignity #ResponsibilityPerception #FreeSpeech #FreeThought #FreeOpinion #FreeExpression We, the undersigned ask PayPal on taking back the blocking of donations calls in the documentation of the author. We, the signatories think that blocking of donations call for documentations, which fulfils the requirements of Article 19 UDHR, Article 10 of ECHR and Article 5 of the German Basic Law, constitutes a disregard of fundamental human rights. We, the undersigned believing furthermore that such measures show analogies to the sinister German history where related to aryanization and deportation even only rudimentary involved participants (such as banks and insurance companies) used any means in order to prevent or hinder the claims of perceptions of victims. Thus, only anti-Semitic intentions can be certified to such behavior. We, the signatories are convinced that PayPal with its exposed partiality, due to blockage of donation calls, shows against the world public opinion that it does not have the intellectual, ethical and moral maturity to cover the requirements for the key role of future payment systems. We, the undersigned have the impression that the exposed partiality of PayPal indicates undoubtedly that this company would acting ruthlessly, without any ethical and moral considerations and thus a repetition of those human rights abuses has to be feared, which is from the sinister German history documented through irresponsible acting companies. We, the undersigned match to the world's respected historian Timothy Garton Ash, that a restriction of freedom of expression by personality rights is only justified for child abuse or for so-called revenge porn. There is no doubt that the undermining of the freedom of expression was justified with an alleged violations of personal rights by all unjust systems. Therefore such kind of alleged justifications lacks any real legal basis. We, the undersigned would like to point out that the European Court of Human Rights had already repeatedly Germany admonished to keep in mind for topics with public interest the primacy of the fundamental right of freedom of expression against alleged personality rights. The European Court of Justice had thus repeatedly appealed to the sense of responsibility of the German legal system due to its burdened past and therefore brought a not unfounded concern to expression of a possibly repetition of the disastrous history by just ignoring its perception of responsibility. We, the signatories are convinced that the elimination of free speech through referred measures as well as to deletions, blocking or other disabling mechanisms of accesses contradicts to any democratic self-conception, as well as to the principles of rule of law and leaves an impression of ignoring historical lessons or of the perception of an effort to abrogate the liberal order. We, the signatories consider the ruthless application of these measures as an indication to an inhuman, fundamental rights-defying attitude of the addressees of the petition. We, the signatories calls therefore a worldwide boycott of the addressed companies in order to meet the demands on the responsibility perception relating to the sinister German history thereby. With kind regards The signers
	Further links Complete version of the petition Compact version of the petition Short version of the petition Petition letter