PetitionBoycottPayPalENletter_201606

	#NoOpinionSuppression #NoCensorship #NoConfidenceAbuse #NoRightsViolation #NoAntiSemitism #HumanRights #HumanDignity #ResponsibilityPerception #FreeSpeech #FreeThought #FreeOpinion #FreeExpression @PayPal @AirbusDS @Signalis Worldwide call to boycott of the above companies due to anti-Semitic attitudes, as well as disregarding human rights and fundamental ethical maxims. Other addressees of the petition: @FlorianHensel @BernhardGerwert @ThomasEnders @LarsImmisch @AndreaPrinz @KaiSchmidt @WolframSchorr @MarcusKrol @SéverineRitter @TanjaHaller
	Petition letter Petition letter to: David Engel, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. David Ferri, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Rupert Keeley, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Victoria Reanney, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Richard Swales, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Séverine Ritter, Brand Risk Management of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Tanja Haller, Brand Risk Management of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Bernhard Gerwert, CEO of Airbus Defence and Space Thomas Enders, CEO of Airbus Group Lars Immisch, Head of HR of Airbus Defence and Space Andrea Prinz, Airbus Defence and Space Kai Schmidt, Airbus Defence and Space Wolfram Schorr, Signalis GmbH Marcus Krol, IN innovative-navigation GmbH Florian Hensel, Attorney of Law in Munich, Germany #NoOpinionSuppression #NoCensorship #NoConfidenceAbuse #NoRightsViolation #NoAntiSemitism #HumanRights #HumanDignity #ResponsibilityPerception #FreeSpeech #FreeThought #FreeOpinion #FreeExpression We, the undersigned ask PayPal on taking back the blocking of donations calls in the documentation of the author. We, the signatories think that blocking of donations call for documentations, which fulfils the requirements of Article 19 UDHR, Article 10 of ECHR and Article 5 of the German Basic Law, constitutes a disregard of fundamental human rights. We, the undersigned believing furthermore that such measures show analogies to the sinister German history where related to aryanization and deportation even only rudimentary involved participants (such as banks and insurance companies) used any means in order to prevent or hinder the claims of perceptions of victims. Thus, only anti-Semitic intentions can be certified to such behavior. We, the signatories are convinced that PayPal with its exposed partiality, due to blockage of donation calls, shows against the world public opinion that it does not have the intellectual, ethical and moral maturity to cover the requirements for the key role of future payment systems. We, the undersigned have the impression that the exposed partiality of PayPal indicates undoubtedly that this company would acting ruthlessly, without any ethical and moral considerations and thus a repetition of those human rights abuses has to be feared, which is from the sinister German history documented through irresponsible acting companies. We, the undersigned match to the world's respected historian Timothy Garton Ash, that a restriction of freedom of expression by personality rights is only justified for child abuse or for so-called revenge porn. There is no doubt that the undermining of the freedom of expression was justified with an alleged violations of personal rights by all unjust systems. Therefore such kind of alleged justifications lacks any real legal basis. We, the undersigned would like to point out that the European Court of Human Rights had already repeatedly Germany admonished to keep in mind for topics with public interest the primacy of the fundamental right of freedom of expression against alleged personality rights. The European Court of Justice had thus repeatedly appealed to the sense of responsibility of the German legal system due to its burdened past and therefore brought a not unfounded concern to expression of a possibly repetition of the disastrous history by just ignoring its perception of responsibility. We, the signatories are convinced that the elimination of free speech through referred measures as well as to deletions, blocking or other disabling mechanisms of accesses contradicts to any democratic self-conception, as well as to the principles of rule of law and leaves an impression of ignoring historical lessons or of the perception of an effort to abrogate the liberal order. We, the signatories consider the ruthless application of these measures as an indication to an inhuman, fundamental rights-defying attitude of the addressees of the petition. We, the signatories calls therefore a worldwide boycott of the addressed companies in order to meet the demands on the responsibility perception relating to the sinister German history thereby. With kind regards The signers
	Further links Complete version of the petition Compact version of the petition Short version of the petition Petition letter

PetitionBoycottPayPalDEletter_201606

	#NoOpinionSuppression #NoCensorship #NoConfidenceAbuse #NoRightsViolation #NoAntiSemitism #HumanRights #HumanDignity #ResponsibilityPerception #FreeSpeech #FreeThought #FreeOpinion #FreeExpression @PayPal @AirbusDS @Signalis Weltweiter Aufruf zum Boykott der Unternehmen wegen antisemitischer Gesinnung, sowie Missachtung von Menschenrechten und fundamentalen ethischen Maximen. Weitere Adressaten der Petition: @FlorianHensel @BernhardGerwert @ThomasEnders @LarsImmisch @AndreaPrinz @KaiSchmidt @WolframSchorr @MarcusKrol @SéverineRitter @TanjaHaller
	Petitionsbrief Petitionsbrief an: David Engel, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. David Ferri, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Rupert Keeley, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Victoria Reanney, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Richard Swales, personally liable shareholder of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Séverine Ritter, Brand Risk Management of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Tanja Haller, Brand Risk Management of PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. Bernhard Gerwert, CEO of Airbus Defence and Space Thomas Enders, CEO of Airbus Group Lars Immisch, Head of HR of Airbus Defence and Space Andrea Prinz, Airbus Defence and Space Kai Schmidt, Airbus Defence and Space Wolfram Schorr, Signalis GmbH Marcus Krol, IN innovative-navigation GmbH Florian Hensel, Rechtsanwalt in München, Deutschland #NoOpinionSuppression #NoCensorship #NoConfidenceAbuse #NoRightsViolation #NoAntiSemitism #HumanRights #HumanDignity #ResponsibilityPerception #FreeSpeech #FreeThought #FreeOpinion #FreeExpression Wir, die Unterzeichner fordern PayPal zur Rücknahme der Blockierung von Spenden-Aufrufen in den Dokumentationen des Verfassers auf. Wir, die Unterzeichner vertreten die Auffassung, dass eine Blockierung von Spenden-Aufrufen für Dokumentationen, welche im vollen Umfang den Vorgaben des Artikel 19 AEMR, Artikel 10 EMRK und Artikel 5 des deutschen Grundgesetzes entsprechen, eine Missachtung grundlegender Menschenrechte darstellt. Wir, die Unterzeichner sind darüber hinaus der Auffassung, dass derartige Maßnahmen Analogien zur sinistren deutschen Geschichte aufzeigen, wo im Zusammenhang mit Arisierung und Deportation auch von lediglich rudimentär Beteiligten (wie Banken und Versicherungen) jegliche Mittel angewandt wurden, um Anspruchswahrnehmungen von Opfern zu unterbinden oder zu behindern. Somit kann einem solchen Verhalten nur antisemitische Absichten attestiert werden. Wir, die Unterzeichner sind der Überzeugung, dass PayPal mit ihrer exponierten Parteilichkeit, durch Blockierung von Spenden-Aufrufen der Weltöffentlichkeit zeigt, dass es nicht über jene intellektuelle, sittliche, ethisch und moralische Reife verfügt, um für eine Schlüsselrolle für zukünftige Zahlungssysteme geeignet zu sein. Wir, die Unterzeichner haben den Eindruck, dass die exponierte Parteilichkeit von PayPal zweifelsohne darauf hindeutet, dass dieses Unternehmen skrupellos, ohne jegliche ethischen und moralischen Überlegungen agieren würde und somit eine Wiederholung jener Menschenrechtsmissachtungen zu befürchten wäre, welche uns aus der sinistren deutschen Geschichte von bedenkenlos handelnden Unternehmen dokumentiert ist. Wir, die Unterzeichner stimmen mit dem weltweit geachtete Historiker Timothy Garton Ash überein, dass eine Einschränkung der freien Meinungsäußerung durch Persönlichkeitsrecht nur bei Kindesmissbrauch oder sogenannten Rachepornos gerechtfertigt sein kann, da das Unterminieren der freien Meinungsäußerung von allen Unrechtssystemen mit vorgeblichen Persönlichkeitsrechten begründet wurde. Wir, die Unterzeichner weisen darauf hin, dass der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte Deutschland bereits wiederholt ermahnt hat, den Vorrang des fundamentalen Rechts der freien Meinungsäußerung gegenüber vorgeblichen Persönlichkeitsrechten bei öffentlichem Interesse zu beachten. Der Europäische Gerichtshof hat damit wiederholt an das Verantwortungsbewusstsein des deutschen Rechtssystem aufgrund dessen belasteter Vergangenheit appelliert und damit eine nicht unbegründete Besorgnis einer unheilvollen Geschichtswiederholung durch Missachtung eben dieser Verantwortungswahrnehmung zum Ausdruck gebracht. Wir, die Unterzeichner sind der Überzeugung, dass die Unterbindung der freien Meinungsäußerung durch genannte Maßnahmen sowie durch Löschungen, Blockierungen oder anderweitige Mechanismen der Zugangsbehinderung, jeglichen demokratischen Selbstverständnis sowie den Grundsätzen von Rechtsstaatlichkeit widersprecht und einen Eindruck der Missachtung historischer Lektionen hinterlässt bzw. eine Wahrnehmung des Bestrebens zur außer Kraftsetzung der freiheitliche Grundordnung. Wir, die Unterzeichner halten die skrupellose Anwendung der genannten Maßnahmen als einen Hinweis auf eine menschenverachtende und Grundrechte verachtende Gesinnung der Adressaten der Petition. Wir, die Unterzeichner rufen deshalb zum weltweiten Boykott der adressierten Unternehmen auf, um hierdurch der Verantwortungswahrnehmung gegenüber einer sinistren deutschen Historie gerecht zu werden. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Die Unterzeichnenden
	Weitere Links Komplett-Version der Petition Kompakt-Version der Petition Kurz-Version der Petition Petitionsbrief

PetitionBoycottPayPalENshort_201606

	#NoOpinionSuppression #NoCensorship #NoConfidenceAbuse #NoRightsViolation #NoAntiSemitism #HumanRights #HumanDignity #ResponsibilityPerception #FreeSpeech #FreeThought #FreeOpinion #FreeExpression @PayPal @AirbusDS @Signalis Worldwide call to boycott of the above companies due to anti-Semitic attitudes, as well as disregarding human rights and fundamental ethical maxims. Other addressees of the petition: @FlorianHensel @BernhardGerwert @ThomasEnders @LarsImmisch @AndreaPrinz @KaiSchmidt @WolframSchorr @MarcusKrol @SéverineRitter @TanjaHaller
		Please sign my petition: Call4Boycott [ShortURL] Call4Boycott [LongURL]
	Claim of the petition The petition calls PayPal on taking back the blocking of donations calls in the documentation of the author. The blocking of donations call for documentations, which fulfills the requirements of article 19 UDHR, article 10 of the ECHR and article 5 of the German Basic law, constitutes a disregard of fundamental human rights. In addition, such measures show analogies to the sinister German history where related to aryanization and deportation even only rudimentary involved participants (such as banks and insurance companies) used any means in order to prevent or hinder the claims of perceptions of victims. Thus, only anti-Semitic intentions can be certified to such behavior. With its exposed partiality, due to blockage of donation calls, PayPal shows against the world public opinion that it does not have the intellectual, ethical and moral maturity to cover the requirements for the key role of future payment systems. As some years ago, the largest German bank shook the confidence of investors to a large German media group because of partiality, such kind of behavior was exposed by everyone as unworthy and unethical behavior, which are not appropriate behaviors of financial service providers. The exposed partiality of PayPal indicates undoubtedly that this company would acting ruthlessly, without any ethical and moral considerations and thus a repetition of those human rights abuses has to be feared, which is from the sinister German history documented through irresponsible acting companies. The world's respected historian Timothy Garton Ash justifies a restriction of freedom of expression by personality rights only for child abuse or for so-called revenge porn. There is no doubt that the undermining of the freedom of expression was justified with an alleged violations of personal rights by all unjust systems. Therefore such kind of alleged justifications lacks any real legal basis. The European Court of Human Rights had already repeatedly Germany admonished to keep in mind for topics with public interest the primacy of the fundamental right of freedom of expression against alleged personality rights. The European Court of Justice had thus repeatedly appealed to the sense of responsibility of the German legal system due to its burdened past and therefore brought a not unfounded concern to expression of a possibly repetition of the disastrous history by just ignoring its perception of responsibility. The elimination of free speech through referred measures as well as to deletions, blocking or other disabling mechanisms of accesses contradicts to any democratic self-conception, as well as to the principles of rule of law and leaves an impression of ignoring historical lessons or of the perception of an effort to abrogate the liberal order. The ruthless application of these measures points to an inhuman, fundamental rights-defying attitude of the addressees of the petition. The petition calls therefore for a worldwide boycott of the addressed companies in order to meet the demands on the responsibility perception relating to the sinister German history thereby.
	Message to readers Please sign my petition that the disregard of freedom of expression and freedom of information as well as the perception of responsibility will no longer be abused through advanced reasons and as a farce of a commitment to democracy, the rule of law and the liberal democratic basic order will be served. The disregard of these principles leads at some point inevitably to an irreversible sinister development – which we should have learned from our history and consequently have drawn conclusions from it. No democracy can survive without unrestricted freedom of expression and freedom of information. Only with freedom of expression and freedom of information can be established a culture of error management in order to be able to detect such sinister developments at an early stage to prevent such developments. Please support my petition. Many thanks for your help.
	Further links Complete version of the petition Compact version of the petition Short version of the petition Petition letter