PetitionBoycottPayPalENshort_201606

	#NoOpinionSuppression #NoCensorship #NoConfidenceAbuse #NoRightsViolation #NoAntiSemitism #HumanRights #HumanDignity #ResponsibilityPerception #FreeSpeech #FreeThought #FreeOpinion #FreeExpression @PayPal @AirbusDS @Signalis Worldwide call to boycott of the above companies due to anti-Semitic attitudes, as well as disregarding human rights and fundamental ethical maxims. Other addressees of the petition: @FlorianHensel @BernhardGerwert @ThomasEnders @LarsImmisch @AndreaPrinz @KaiSchmidt @WolframSchorr @MarcusKrol @SéverineRitter @TanjaHaller
		Please sign my petition: Call4Boycott [ShortURL] Call4Boycott [LongURL]
	Claim of the petition The petition calls PayPal on taking back the blocking of donations calls in the documentation of the author. The blocking of donations call for documentations, which fulfills the requirements of article 19 UDHR, article 10 of the ECHR and article 5 of the German Basic law, constitutes a disregard of fundamental human rights. In addition, such measures show analogies to the sinister German history where related to aryanization and deportation even only rudimentary involved participants (such as banks and insurance companies) used any means in order to prevent or hinder the claims of perceptions of victims. Thus, only anti-Semitic intentions can be certified to such behavior. With its exposed partiality, due to blockage of donation calls, PayPal shows against the world public opinion that it does not have the intellectual, ethical and moral maturity to cover the requirements for the key role of future payment systems. As some years ago, the largest German bank shook the confidence of investors to a large German media group because of partiality, such kind of behavior was exposed by everyone as unworthy and unethical behavior, which are not appropriate behaviors of financial service providers. The exposed partiality of PayPal indicates undoubtedly that this company would acting ruthlessly, without any ethical and moral considerations and thus a repetition of those human rights abuses has to be feared, which is from the sinister German history documented through irresponsible acting companies. The world's respected historian Timothy Garton Ash justifies a restriction of freedom of expression by personality rights only for child abuse or for so-called revenge porn. There is no doubt that the undermining of the freedom of expression was justified with an alleged violations of personal rights by all unjust systems. Therefore such kind of alleged justifications lacks any real legal basis. The European Court of Human Rights had already repeatedly Germany admonished to keep in mind for topics with public interest the primacy of the fundamental right of freedom of expression against alleged personality rights. The European Court of Justice had thus repeatedly appealed to the sense of responsibility of the German legal system due to its burdened past and therefore brought a not unfounded concern to expression of a possibly repetition of the disastrous history by just ignoring its perception of responsibility. The elimination of free speech through referred measures as well as to deletions, blocking or other disabling mechanisms of accesses contradicts to any democratic self-conception, as well as to the principles of rule of law and leaves an impression of ignoring historical lessons or of the perception of an effort to abrogate the liberal order. The ruthless application of these measures points to an inhuman, fundamental rights-defying attitude of the addressees of the petition. The petition calls therefore for a worldwide boycott of the addressed companies in order to meet the demands on the responsibility perception relating to the sinister German history thereby.
	Message to readers Please sign my petition that the disregard of freedom of expression and freedom of information as well as the perception of responsibility will no longer be abused through advanced reasons and as a farce of a commitment to democracy, the rule of law and the liberal democratic basic order will be served. The disregard of these principles leads at some point inevitably to an irreversible sinister development – which we should have learned from our history and consequently have drawn conclusions from it. No democracy can survive without unrestricted freedom of expression and freedom of information. Only with freedom of expression and freedom of information can be established a culture of error management in order to be able to detect such sinister developments at an early stage to prevent such developments. Please support my petition. Many thanks for your help.
	Further links Complete version of the petition Compact version of the petition Short version of the petition Petition letter